The FUD crypter service industry is giving a second life to a lot of old and kind-of- old malware, which can be pulled off the shelf by just about. How do I make my rat exe FUD? I don’t know how to make a crypter using a unique stub, explain or possibly suggest an alternative to avoid AV. Page 1 of 33 – FUD CRYPTER – STATIC CRYPT 4 – posted in Malicious Software: Hidden Content Youll be able to see the hidden content once.

Author: Tygogor Bashura
Country: Namibia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Travel
Published (Last): 7 July 2017
Pages: 455
PDF File Size: 1.78 Mb
ePub File Size: 14.66 Mb
ISBN: 377-9-67986-620-8
Downloads: 99807
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Daihn

The basics of reverse connections are done usually using assembly, however, which is why I recommend learning it in detail as well. Where can I find info about making a good crypter. Welcome to Reddit, the front page of the internet.

I would go with that first. In addition to this, since crypters are relatively smaller than RATs, modifying the code to defeat SBD is also much, much more convenient. How do I make my rat exe FUD? NET crypters can do both of these methods easily, in fact, the reflective-assembly-loading code is just one line of code: To code a native crypter with these two options is not quite trivial with respect to executing a.

Hope this helped you in some way. I don’t know how to make a crypter using a unique stub, explain or possibly suggest an alternative to avoid AV detection. And, of course, make it so that the malware does NOT run under sandboxes and VMs, or anything of the sort. Also, remember how Anti Virus programs detect your virus in the first place, signatures, so don’t use common code, be creative, and go as dynamic as possible. I understand this comment might not seem very useful but if you follow my advice it will be the most useful comment you’ll get for this post.


This is what makes crypters or packers so popular. The whole gud of a custom crypter is that it’s custom, so there’s no unpacker for it. NET binary because they require dependencies to run which are not shared with native executables however, the RunPE method is still relatively simple.

We teach you how to do it, use it at your crypterr risk. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. It isn’t difficult to bypass heuristic analysis, as long as you understand how it works.

Fud crypter | C++ Programming | PHP | Software Architecture

Become a Redditor and subscribe to one of thousands of communities. I use a software to produce the rat lol, I have good knowledge over networking but limited in software code. Once you have the crypter, it’s very simple to just package your malware and deploy it. HowToHack submitted 11 months ago by [deleted]. It is true that ccrypter makes our job a lot more difficult, if you have something like Symantec Endpoint Security, but something well done, usually with reflective dll injection to bypass application-based limitation simple exe injection would also work works like a charm, provided you can obfuscate it well enough to bypass heuristics.

Oh yeah, make sure to use a robust crypto algorithm! Intended for personal, non malicious and educational use. Encryption is a big part of crypger, hence the name. How to create an FUD rat. Invoke null, null ; while the Frypter method’s complexity stays the same as native crypters.


Although creating your own allows you to easily destroy signatures simply by changing the code, it still requires quite a bit of effort and time to initially program one with full functionality.


If your stub is detected, just change your stub code around until it’s no longer detected. Log in fue sign up in seconds. HowToHack subscribe unsubscribereaders users here now Welcome! I could throw at you the simplest piece of malware in the world without any AV being able to detect it.

I am an IT guy who wanted to do computer science but ended crypger with biology. It’s not like you’re going to distribute the key with the binary! Try to not trigger behavioural shields by not doing something incredibly suspicious. Want to add to the discussion?

How to create an FUD rat. : HowToHack

This depends on how the RAT was developed. So to solve your problem, using an existing RAT or not needing to constantly change fyd code is a much more favourable option because it increases your efficiency to infect more users. Exploitation – it-sec-catalog – References to vulnerability exploitation stuff. First of all, it doesn’t seem to me like you have a very good programming knowledge, otherwise you wouldn’t be asking this question.